Slate.com has instructed me to be jealous, and I am. The top 100 editors at Wikipedia are being granted access to JSTOR, for free. Normally, only universities are allowed this privilege. This cooperation is going to do even more to bolster Wikipedia's credibility -- as Fruzsina Eördögh at Slate puts it,
The online encyclopedia gets a bad rap for being at times inaccurate and easily prank-able; the joke goes that the sources listed are usually the top Google searches, not actual scholarly material. If Wikipedia articles become more well-known for citing scholarly journals, however, these criticisms have a real chance of becoming moot.
I have to admit, it's really fun to watch the academic community slowly torpedo the popular prejudice against crowd sourcing. After all, the highest possible degree of public cooperation has always been the method that allowed academia to advance. It's just been a very long time since the amount of cooperation that entailed changed much.